Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
CovfefeAnon's profile
Covfefe Anon
Covfefe Anon
Covfefe Anon
@CovfefeAnon

Tweets

Covfefe Anon

@CovfefeAnon

Not to be confused with 2001 Nobel Peace Prize winner Kofi Annan. 54th Clause of the Magna Carta absolutist. Commentary from an NRx perspective.

Joined July 2017

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Roko‏ @RokoMijic 10 Oct 2020
      Replying to @JackalInHyde

      I think a woman could do science at a professional level and have 5 kids between 21 and, say, 33, but only if she could hand off almost all of the busyness and financial cost of parenting to someone else.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    2. Roko‏ @RokoMijic 10 Oct 2020
      Replying to @RokoMijic @JackalInHyde

      I think if she's a single mum with 4 kids at age 28 and a 5th soon on the way, it's unlikely that she'll be able to do anything other than being a mum. So she'll be on benefits and her mental effort will be going into doctors visits, school arrangements and nappies.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    3. Jackal‏ @JackalInHyde 10 Oct 2020
      Replying to @RokoMijic @RokoMijicUK

      I'm assuming marriage to another sciency type, which should offer a healthy double income. Hiring a nanny/daycare-service/setting up one of the parents jobs as WFH should be enough to cover busybody stuff, especially if older kids trained to handle younger ones.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    4. Jackal‏ @JackalInHyde 10 Oct 2020
      Replying to @JackalInHyde @RokoMijicUK

      I think you really underestimate how much of the challenge here is social as opposed to physical. Two hundred years ago, when we were much poorer and most mothers were expected to work we had much larger families. The limits exist only in the environment our gossip creates for us

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    5. Jackal‏ @JackalInHyde 10 Oct 2020
      Replying to @JackalInHyde @RokoMijicUK

      I don't want to downplay the social aspect as unimportant. There are valid reasons for why people like us don't talk as we do now in the workplace, but fundamentally if there's a physical limit that requires social reorganization as prerequisite. I think you are done on step one.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    6. Jackal‏ @JackalInHyde 10 Oct 2020
      Replying to @JackalInHyde @RokoMijicUK

      I'll also note here that mere replacement-level child rearing is totally feasible for career women in the current equilibrium. Obviously if you require 5 or 8 children that makes it harder, but you don't need to go that high for an improvement on the current situation.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    7. Jackal‏ @JackalInHyde 10 Oct 2020
      Replying to @JackalInHyde @RokoMijicUK

      Further note: If we want to pass blame around, high-status men obviously deserve much of it for valuing attractive women rather than similarly talented women. For smart women, a high status career is one of the best paths toward intelligent men, but they still fail to obtain them

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    8. Roko‏ @RokoMijic 10 Oct 2020
      Replying to @JackalInHyde

      > high-status men obviously deserve much of it for valuing attractive women Valuing attractive women is just doing the socially useful task of weeding out diseases. Unattractive is basically ~diseased. Most women, if fed a healthy diet, are "attractive" when they are 18-25.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    9. Jackal‏ @JackalInHyde 10 Oct 2020
      Replying to @RokoMijic @RokoMijicUK

      The infamous OKCupid data showing that women are more critical of looks than men, also shows that men have a more nuanced view of attractiveness than "diseased" and "not diseased" "Men look for beauty, women look for status" is classic evopsych which seems weird to downplay.pic.twitter.com/pbmzdCSWNr

      2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    10. Roko‏ @RokoMijic 10 Oct 2020
      Replying to @JackalInHyde

      Women are more critical because they're the gatekeepers. But men still filter somewhat.

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      Covfefe Anon‏ @CovfefeAnon 10 Oct 2020
      Replying to @RokoMijic @RokoMijicUK @JackalInHyde

      Not exactly. If you enforce monogamy then men compete for high value women. Then you take the whole pool and filter the children based on the male ability to provide and protect. What survives determines what gets selected for in men and women.

      7:54 AM - 10 Oct 2020
      0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info