I'm saying that no polling is secure when it's run by the left because their norms are that rules and laws are irrelevant when those rules and laws get in the way of their interpretation of justice which is that they always get to win. Inevitable end result of memetic evolution
-
-
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @JimDMiller
Interesting that “the left” has lost plenty of times, then, isn’t it? You’d have thought that they’d have pumped up their voter fraud by now.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @UtilityMonster2 @JimDMiller
Define "lost". Losing to the fake opposition like Bush, Romney or McCain is no real loss so the cheating is minor. Actual massive vote fraud is a last resort because it's a dangerous weapon when the left relies on the compliance of voters.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @JimDMiller
Heh. Classic neoreactionary move: a moment ago, the “Rs” were being praised for opposing voter fraud. Now they were “fake opposition” up until 2016. But then Trump won, so that doesn’t bode well for your theory Reactionaries are Red Tribe hooligans who don’t want to admit it.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @UtilityMonster2 @JimDMiller
It's not praise for (R)s - it was condemnation of the rules that (D)s set for themselves (that (R)s stupidly accept). Democracy is a stupid, destructive idea precisely because it's impossible to have peace with a side that has the rules of engagement that the left does.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @JimDMiller
“(R)s are the ones in favor of things like id for voting” sounds like praise to me.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @UtilityMonster2 @JimDMiller
We've already established your protective stupidity when needed.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @JimDMiller
We’ve established that you’re unable to mind-read. “He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that“ As I said, if you want to know why I consider norms to be important—and why Trump shouldn’t say ‘vote twice’ and Ds shouldn’t pack Court, read Levitsky/Ziblatt.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @UtilityMonster2 @JimDMiller
Don't care why you claim to believe that
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @JimDMiller
Still making those Type I errors, I see (I assume I won’t have to explain to you what they are, again!) As for Trump, he’s doomed, isn’t he?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Nope. We're in Stalin world now - from "who counts to votes" all the way to "how many divisions does the NY Times have?"
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.