Now you’re just repeating yourself, again. “Vote by mail is secure” (as the President and the military know) and “Presidents shouldn’t say ‘vote twice’, even if people won’t be able to vote twice in practice”, are not mutually exclusive positions by any means. The end.
-
-
Those of us who wish to defend liberal democracy know about the importance of norms. As someone who is decidedly not a liberal democrat it’s understandable that you neither know nor care about them (if you’re interested in reading my mind here, read Levitsky and Ziblatt).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
If in-person voting is secure, as most Republicans probably believe, but Obama told his supporters to “try to vote twice in person”, the Right would be singing a completely different tune. While people like me would be condemning Obama for even *saying* such a thing.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @UtilityMonster2 @JimDMiller
Wut? (R)s are the ones in favor of things like id for voting. If someone on the side that's fanatically opposed to any checks whatsoever on fraudulent voting encouraged fraudulent voting that's obviously an invitation to do so.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @JimDMiller
So you’re saying that in-person voting isn’t secure? That anyone could just vote twice?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @UtilityMonster2 @JimDMiller
I'm saying that no polling is secure when it's run by the left because their norms are that rules and laws are irrelevant when those rules and laws get in the way of their interpretation of justice which is that they always get to win. Inevitable end result of memetic evolution
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @JimDMiller
Interesting that “the left” has lost plenty of times, then, isn’t it? You’d have thought that they’d have pumped up their voter fraud by now.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @UtilityMonster2 @JimDMiller
Define "lost". Losing to the fake opposition like Bush, Romney or McCain is no real loss so the cheating is minor. Actual massive vote fraud is a last resort because it's a dangerous weapon when the left relies on the compliance of voters.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @JimDMiller
Heh. Classic neoreactionary move: a moment ago, the “Rs” were being praised for opposing voter fraud. Now they were “fake opposition” up until 2016. But then Trump won, so that doesn’t bode well for your theory Reactionaries are Red Tribe hooligans who don’t want to admit it.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Presumably, you think that the election is lost for Trump, then? The “libs” have their “voter fraud” ready to deploy? You should be impressed: it’s helping to bring down the system you supposedly despise (but really, you’re a Red Tribe fanatic).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Obviously they're lining up vote fraud - hence why they're enabling methods that wouldn't pass the most cursory of security audits. American democracy has degenerated to the point where it's obvious to everyone that we're at the Stalin stage of "who counts the votes"
-
-
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @JimDMiller
Trump doesn’t stand a chance then, does he?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.