“You began this by failing to understand a refutation by jumping into exactly the trap set for you by someone you presumably call low IQ.” No, you thought you’d set a trap. I bypassed the “trap”. You then insisted that I’d fallen into the trap anyway by engaging in mind-reading.
-
-
Replying to @UtilityMonster2 @JimDMiller
Covfefe Anon Retweeted Covfefe Anon
You're utterly trapped here and no one can or does take your position seriously - it's a transparent lie because of the mismatch.https://twitter.com/CovfefeAnon/status/1308854041594810369 …
Covfefe Anon added,
Covfefe Anon @CovfefeAnonReplying to @UtilityMonster2 @JimDMillerWait, so your position isn't "vote by mail is secure" it's just "candidates shouldn't openly say supporters should vote twice - meant seriously or not"? That's funny since the statement doesn't exist in a vacuum - "I'm not pro-election fraud, I'm merely anti-anti-fraud"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @JimDMiller
Now you’re just repeating yourself, again. “Vote by mail is secure” (as the President and the military know) and “Presidents shouldn’t say ‘vote twice’, even if people won’t be able to vote twice in practice”, are not mutually exclusive positions by any means. The end.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Those of us who wish to defend liberal democracy know about the importance of norms. As someone who is decidedly not a liberal democrat it’s understandable that you neither know nor care about them (if you’re interested in reading my mind here, read Levitsky and Ziblatt).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
If in-person voting is secure, as most Republicans probably believe, but Obama told his supporters to “try to vote twice in person”, the Right would be singing a completely different tune. While people like me would be condemning Obama for even *saying* such a thing.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @UtilityMonster2 @JimDMiller
Wut? (R)s are the ones in favor of things like id for voting. If someone on the side that's fanatically opposed to any checks whatsoever on fraudulent voting encouraged fraudulent voting that's obviously an invitation to do so.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @JimDMiller
So you’re saying that in-person voting isn’t secure? That anyone could just vote twice?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @UtilityMonster2 @JimDMiller
I'm saying that no polling is secure when it's run by the left because their norms are that rules and laws are irrelevant when those rules and laws get in the way of their interpretation of justice which is that they always get to win. Inevitable end result of memetic evolution
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @JimDMiller
Interesting that “the left” has lost plenty of times, then, isn’t it? You’d have thought that they’d have pumped up their voter fraud by now.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
But the plain fact is that even if all of the GOP’s election integrity demands had been in place, and Obama had said “vote twice”, we’d never hear the end of it from people like you. Because you’re so, transparently, partisan. A Red Tribe fanatic.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Oh am I? Learn something new every day.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.