You really do like throwing out terms you don't understand, don't you? False rejection of a true hypothesis - doesn't apply here at all. This is a very strong mark of a midwit in over his head.
Wut? (R)s are the ones in favor of things like id for voting. If someone on the side that's fanatically opposed to any checks whatsoever on fraudulent voting encouraged fraudulent voting that's obviously an invitation to do so.
-
-
So you’re saying that in-person voting isn’t secure? That anyone could just vote twice?
-
I'm saying that no polling is secure when it's run by the left because their norms are that rules and laws are irrelevant when those rules and laws get in the way of their interpretation of justice which is that they always get to win. Inevitable end result of memetic evolution
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.