funny how the media turning every negative interaction btwn a white person and a black person into racial blood libel is considered the epitome of virtue but the second someone mentions a specific and documented instance of a jewish man funding riots it’s “dangerous rhetoric”https://twitter.com/PeterBeinart/status/1306351966021353472 …
-
Show this thread
-
i wonder how peter would feel if a week ago his publication had run a fawning article about some brave, wise gentile poet inviting jews to interrogate the implicit evil of their identity and successpic.twitter.com/7ZDUkEYHqT
1 reply 1 retweet 21 likesShow this thread -
what if last week the new york times had published a chart listing several hundred media, government, and business elites in this country and put little stars of david next to all the jews? how would peter feel about that?pic.twitter.com/vEHIAVZEc8
1 reply 2 retweets 26 likesShow this thread -
i have actually had conversations w/ ppl who told me that even if george soros *is* a politically connected financier, it’s still anti-semitic to mention that fact because it feeds into the “stereotype.” not even strawmanning - this is explicitly the argument
4 replies 6 retweets 35 likesShow this thread
In the beforetimes when black violence wasn't only covertly worshiped people would call links to worldstar videos "racist" - actual video of actual real events was "racist" - meaning it confirmed the accuracy of stereotypes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.