Liberalism decays into wokeness for a very simple reason. It asserts that there's a universal human nature that leads to one ideal form of social organization that maximizes human flourishing. As it turns out not all groups do equally well under permissive liberal rules. 1/2https://twitter.com/wokal_distance/status/1301807188948602880 …
-
Show this thread
-
The liberal is left with two possible counterarguments "Groups are different and will have different outcomes" or "RACISM!!!!" Both are utterly fatal to liberalism. The first denies the core assumption. The second implies a problem that doesn't exist so can't ever be solved.
2 replies 3 retweets 40 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
In a meta sense choosing the system chooses the distribution of outcomes between groups. 1/2
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
But it doesn't - observably. Liberalism sets a single rule that's unworkable for everyone when groups differ - which they do. There used to be unprincipled exceptions that allowed there to be different rules but those get eaten away with righteous fervor by liberals.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This was not very long ago - 13 years - and was functional enough to get NYC to be a civilized place but there's no room in liberalism for any treatment that relies on individual judgement and might be "unequal". 1/2 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uj0mtxXEGE8 …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
The only legitimate outcomes to a liberal are ones in a courtroom In a courtroom, every outcome is recorded and can be scrutinized later to ensure that no one deviated from the officially approved one way of doing things Of course, the whole system breaks down but ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
