Blocking a lot of enemies of liberalism today.
-
-
Replying to @ConceptualJames
Disappearing people like Mao and silencing dissidents, letting the mask slip...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Schwa507 @ConceptualJames
He's under no obligation to give anyone an audience. Liberty necessitates the freedom to associate with whomever you want.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
For example, if, as a store owner, I decide that my best interests are served by catering only to one race or if all neighbors agree to create a development that only allows people of one race to live there liberalism guarantees that because of freedom of association, right?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @Realgeron and
The Supreme Court’s assertion of “sincerely held religious beliefs IMHO was a bad decision. Personal beliefs should not be a domain or f the government. The contradictions it creates now have to be refereed by the judiciary.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JeffersonLars @Realgeron and
Awfully useful if you've captured the judiciary, isn't it?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @Realgeron and
It’s slippery slope. Find something to complain about, create a religion and get what I want.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
You're assuming the game isn't rigged. If your new insincere religion isn't prog approved not only do constitutional protections not give you extra rights, you might get incinerated. Much better to capture the judiciary.pic.twitter.com/tvOCufgknj
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.