>You need to do it before it takes root. Dude
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @WeasleWords and
@weaslewords is in possession of a time machine and is hinting that we should go back to the 1950s before wokeness took root so we can change the course of history.pic.twitter.com/5qVNWNhBMC1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @RokoMijic @CovfefeAnon and
cue argument about how 1950 is already too late and we really need to go back to 1,000,000 BC and persuade the chimps not to leave the forest
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @RokoMijic @RokoMijicUK and
I mean, 1950 *is* far too late. FDR's state apparatus already hardened against any control and already throwing their weight behind Mao in China - the rot is pretty deep at that point.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @WeasleWords and
If doc brown offered us a lift back to 1950s America would you turn it down? Assume similar resources to what you have now, and your goal is to stop woke & no cheating allowed (can't magically make money by betting on sports and the like)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @RokoMijic @RokoMijicUK and
To me that question boils down to "can I get myself in position to be consigliere to Nixon?" and given that can I persuade and influence him and even if he's persuaded of the scope of the enemy does he have the tools to actually win? Easier if it's earlier so can advise Patton
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @RokoMijicUK and
As far as public writing and persuasion goes the period around 1950 is probably a nadir for ability to reach an influential audience with an actual right wing message.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @WeasleWords and
So even knowing the actual history of the 70 years after 1950, you don't think there's much you and a small band of loyal supporters could do? A 70 year perfect information headstart isn't enough to solve the problem? Then we are truly f***ed
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @RokoMijic @RokoMijicUK and
It's an asymmetric game - the right has only one way to win: coalesce behind a leader who becomes a King. The left needs to keep swimming left to avoid eating themselves. 1/2
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Candidates for the right to coalesce behind have to have the support of the military and the understanding of what they're actually facing and that it needs to be entirely ripped out. Those men are few - do you have any other plausible candidates in 20th century America? 2/3
-
-
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @RokoMijicUK and
The job is then to persuade those men about the future direction of the country and the full nature of the machine using superior knowledge gained over 70 years of observation but from there it's up to the leader to actually do most of the work in creating cohesion. 3/3
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @WeasleWords and
I'm skeptical of the "We need a king" angle. Kings, being individual men, are high variance. Sometimes you get Lee Kuan Yew, but sometimes you get Wilhelm Hohenzollern or Louis XVI.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.