9. @JimDMiller
Virtue signalling is real, and that implies that a lack of virtue signalling from a person means they are probably less kind, less loyal, less friendly etc than average.
Even if the virtue signalling is socially harmful and false, you should still update on it.
-
Show this thread
-
10.
@MugaSofer John Snow stabs Daenerys Targaryen to death in the last episode of Game of Thrones, all the important characters die or go elsewhere and a bunch of nobodies who you don't care about end up with all the titles and stuff. It's super cringe.1 reply 0 retweets 27 likesShow this thread -
11.
@Mlxebz Any system to get people to cooperate and play positive sum games is just another opportunity to play negative sum games by manipulating the system itself.1 reply 3 retweets 37 likesShow this thread -
12.
@imhinesmi Many of your ancestors were rapists, murderers, women who cuckolded their husbands, men who cheated etc. Think clearly about the process that created you and the incentives hidden within you.3 replies 6 retweets 63 likesShow this thread -
When looked for it turns out that cuckholdry is actually very rare in the Eurasian species of human
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
For present day about 1.5% at the high end. Last names vs genes which covers a few hundred years of history - 0.73% for Afrikaners, 1.6% for Irish, 1.3% for Englishhttps://westhunt.wordpress.com/2013/01/27/by-blows-paternal-age-and-all-that/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @imhinesmi
Yeah, well 1%× thousands of generations = certainty
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
The the latter numbers indicate a ~1% chance for at least one event in the last few hundred years - that's how often you get a genetic mismatch with a last name. 1% for a single event in a line for 20 events; not for each event.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Those numbers really do highlight how bad modern society is when examined at it more closely. Notice the drastic mismatch between the modern numbers and the historic. Present day is ~99% for paternal certainty but over 20 generations ~99% for no cuckholding - implies much lower
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Running through this quickly it for the result to be a 1% chance of there being a surname / genetic mismatch you need not 99% of paternity certainty but ~99.95% paternity certainty. Modern society is awful.
-
-
Math backup for that: Binomial distribution, 20 trials, 20 successes, p() = .99 - result is 82% p() needs to be at .9994 to get to the 98.8% we see.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @imhinesmi
That's interesting. Also, remember that a 1% chance of cuckoldry means that quite a lot of attempted cuckoldry has to happen, it's not an instant/certain thing.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.