I don’t understand what you’re losing by pointing out where you agree with your opponents? Seems like good rhetoric to me, whether your audience agrees with your opponents or with you. Once you point that out you can still defend free speech on principle. https://twitter.com/l0m3z/status/1280916571628507136 …
-
-
I don’t know what that ideology is, but Chomsky has defended a Holocaust denier. Some of the others have also defended speech that they substantively disagreed with, though they can’t top a Holocaust denier.
-
Ask them if debate about racial differences in intelligence and behavior should be allowed; they will all explicitly deny that it should be.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.