One of the less consequential but especially annoying contentions of the racialists is that contending that a group of people is congenitally a little stupid is not a claim of inferiority. Intelligence is a directional concept: that is exactly what it is.https://twitter.com/EPoe187/status/1277571389663309824 …
-
-
Replying to @ent3c
Some dog species are way less intelligent than other dog species yet we can talk openly about it without our brains becoming SJW mush. Hopefully people will start to see everything else the same way. All people are animals.
4 replies 0 retweets 19 likes -
Replying to @jurijfedorov @ent3c
Except that “races” aren’t breeds. This would be like arguing that yellow labs are smarter than black labs because of their fur colour
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @Jose1Pino @ent3c
Races are not skin colors. Just like dog breeds are not fur colors.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Humans are not like dog breeds.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Of course not. We are more diverse genetically.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Are you sure? The variation between dog breeds is much greater than the variation between human populations (27.5% versus 5.4%). Conversely, the degree of genetic homogeneity is much greater within individual dog breeds than within distinct human populations (94.6% versus 72.5%).
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Unsurprisingly, you're completely factually wrong. The difference between human "races" is as great as or greater than the difference between separate canid *species*pic.twitter.com/wWXOGKyoNz
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
What I really find repugnant though is the claim that we’re justifying “racial inferiority.” That’s a flat lie. I don’t think people who are less intelligent than I am are “inferior.”