This might be out of nowhere — I'm a newfag, but why wouldn't a king be as bothersome as Hitler and Stalin and the failed regimes of the 20-century? I recognize that monarchies were less brutal compare to the 20-century dictatorships, why was that?
-
-
-
It's an excellent question to ask. The very abbreviated answer is that the pressures under which a leader who came to power by getting gaining the leadership of a popular movement are very different than the pressures that a king is under. 1/2
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.