It’s just gonna drive me nuts watching people day after day react to every uptick in an infections-‘curve’ in some state or another & freak out because that uptick is higher than some other states that already had a lot of infections it’s all just reshuffled timing!!
The best argument that I've heard for it not going to 60% is actually nothing - just a bare assertion that it will for no particular reason. It's going there (more or less) and the path is slightly random.
-
-
It will go wherever it goes. We can do some amount of ‘sustainable’ distancing to de-connect our graph, this could reduce the final total. But we can’t do lockdowns forever. I thought everyone agreed, but then they keep complaining at the result of not forever-lockdowning.
-
The other thing that (could’ve) reduced the final (death) total was try to make younger/healthier, not old/vulnerable, get exposed first to build immunity, so its spread stalls. Like a controlled-burn for a forest fire. We did & are still doing the opposite of that tho
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.