This means "herd immunity" requires around triple the horror New York has already endured, but everywhere. That's what you are advocating for if you think herd immunity is a good strategy, that level of death and pain.https://twitter.com/NYGovCuomo/status/1256602990355664899 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
It does mean that - you're wrong. as yet there's no sign that the disease has been disproportionately contracted by those most vulnerable to it.
4 replies 2 retweets 14 likes -
However it probably has infected the most infectious, making an argument that herd immunity may not be so far away.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Well, in Bergamo, serological positivity reached 61%.
3 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @gcochran99 @jonatanpallesen and
And deaths were up 568% over previous years (for 5 weeks or so).
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Saying "it reduces future deaths" is mathematically equivalent to saying "it kills people" Take it to the extreme to understand the effect - if 100% of people died tomorrow there would be zero deaths the next year.
7:28 PM - 7 May 2020
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.