The interesting thing about floomers seemingly winning the political argument is that in terms of death and new cases they've been basically 100 percent wrong- but death, esp deaths of poor/fat people, evidently isn't the political pain point, the way overrun hospitals would be https://twitter.com/AlexBerenson/status/1256717513825583104 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
Replying to @toad_spotted
Huh? 100% wrong? I'd say its 80% alarmists vs 20% flumers wrong.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chuckdavenav
no one on the floomer side - zero- said we'd hit 60K by the end of April and likely 100K by the end of May.
3 replies 2 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @toad_spotted
covid positive + antibodies study show low IFR. you can not like the studies, but that's what we have.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chuckdavenav @toad_spotted
Worthless studies don't gain in value because you have no other alternative. Lacking alternatives is false anyway since NYC did moderately good studies that showed about 21% infected last week.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @toad_spotted
the more studies the better. could have went in different direction. you can not like them, but that's what we have.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chuckdavenav @toad_spotted
I just conducted a phone survey by dialing 2 numbers picked at random* and 100% of people are positive for corona - therefore we must have already reached full saturation. * Turns out both of the numbers were actually patient rooms in local hospitals.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @toad_spotted
This person ^^ is mentally retarded
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
yOu mAy nOt LiKe mY sTuDy bUt iT's wHaT wE hAvE You are the moron here.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.