WTH - they were a threat!
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @fleekirony @DeanBradleySFF
it was stuff I've no idea why anyone thinks an employee of an INSURED-FOR-LOSS business has the right to kill someone in that circumstance if your kid purposely knocks over a lamp, do you beat them with a baseball bat?
4 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
Unintentionally revealing that your take on this is to view the criminal as your son.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
no. it's a common (and fairly well-known) analogy
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @PostTheOnion @CovfefeAnon and
Well ones a child and the others a group of potentially armed and dangerous adults who are robbing me. It's like comparing a horse to a Dodge ram
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Rada69053970 @CovfefeAnon and
where did "potentially" and group come from
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PostTheOnion @CovfefeAnon and
Because anyone can conceal a weapon and in the story that started this one of three people robbing a store got shot
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Rada69053970 @CovfefeAnon and
you're moving goalposts let's find out if you actually gaf about your own premise (or are just parrotting what you've been told) answer: if a kid intentionally knocks over a lamp, is it okay to beat them with a baseball bat?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
>you're moving goalposts You original stupid analogy (where a man who wants to rob and possibly murder the store worker is *your* child): >if *your* kid Now >if *a* kid You sympathize with murderous bandits because they hurt people you hate. You are lower than they are.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.