That's not true though. Exactly analogous to saying that the risk of death by jumping into a woodchipper is near zero because last year there were zero fatalities from it. That crime rate is *after* people take massive measures to avoid black people. Look at RE prices.
-
-
So, yes: if you moved into South Harlem or I into a WVa holler, risks of an inter-racial attack would increase. But, the above "integrated middle-class city" scenario very SPECIFICALLY places IRC risks in the context of the median situation where a median risk would occur.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Blacks weren't ethnically cleansed from rural WVa - whites in Harlem were. There's no evidence for the other half of this equivalency (and considerable evidence against it).
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Wait...WHAT? Blacks weren't "ethnically cleansed" from sundown towns in the South during recent-past eras? That is literally, historically, one of the craziest things I've ever heard. I'm not an excuses guy, but...bruh...https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosewood_massacre …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Wow, 6 black people were killed. Compare to the murder count needed to make Detroit or Newark black held territory. Extra judicial killings were a direct consequence of black crime, btw and ending them led directly to the crime explosion (and ethnic cleansing)
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Consider where you are now - not in "cancel" terms, just logical ones. You are arguing that historical lynching was a needed, honorable response to Black crime...but that 15% of modern attacks on whites are a near-genocide. Doesn't this strike YOU as crazy?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Again, the race war was in the past when all major cities with significant black populations had their white populations driven out by waves of "random" crime. The current low rate is because people avoid jumping into the tiger cage at the zoo; not because the tiger cage is safe
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This dystopian nonsense is EXTREMELY damaging to American race relations, now that the old wars are mostly over on both sides. A serious question: would you be afraid to come to a fairly elite Black college and have a drink with me?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I wouldn't fear for my safety but I'd fear compromising my twitter anonymity.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I'll close this whole debate with it, actually. The fact that (1) you'd be cool in 90% of Black environments but would (2) worry about the reaction of twitter SJWs or alties to that reminds us that risks are many, all people are human, and illogical panic is always bad.
#peace1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
I don't consider black people enemies; they're different than my people and have different tastes and tolerance for what they want in public settings and one of those tastes and tolerances is for a more anarchic environment. SJWs on the other hand, absolutely are enemies of all.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.