Why would the @nytimes get a non-scientist to review a book full of scientific claims?https://twitter.com/parul_sehgal/status/1227772317817810946 …
-
-
Replying to @clairlemon @nytimes
The book is not a scientific work. It is not peer reviewed.
14 replies 0 retweets 217 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I have published two peer reviewed books and about twenty articles. I’ve reviewed I have no idea how many. I honestly have no idea what you mean.
1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes
Replying to @manusyadrew @NullusMaximus and
That's the problem there buddy
2:11 PM - 13 Feb 2020
0 replies
0 retweets
6 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.