Yeah, it fits with Epstein He was doing it for blackmail but everything brought to light so far is horny 14+ year old chicks who sometimes screw guys in their social circle and other times take money to screw rich, powerful men. No chicks getting thrown into vans off the street
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @relicn0cer @AndrewQuackson
The *blackmail* is a problem. The fact that 14 year old women have sexual freedom is another, considerably larger problem. Even calling it "child sex" covers for a *different* massive problem - that gay men really like molesting boys.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @relicn0cer @AndrewQuackson
The phrase "sex trafficking" is white knighting because it places the blame for female misbehavior on the nearest man
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @relicn0cer @AndrewQuackson
Cases like Marc Dutroux are the exception - a sicko with his own sick idiosyncrasy - zero to do with someone like Epstein. Gay men are a different matter - there are a lot more of them and they frequently have common pathological behaviors.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @relicn0cer @AndrewQuackson
At least 2 ways this can work: 1 It's repellent to everyone involved but an unfakeable sign of trustworthiness 2 It's an appetite society looks down on (1) is the "kill a kid to join the club". (2) is "here's a hot 15 year old like you couldn't get in HS" - little overlap there
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Building an org for (2) shares nearly nothing with (1)
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.