Many arguments for why it's harmful: 1) (spotted) - signalling hazard 2) A reservoir for particularly deadly infectious diseases 3) Disturbing frequency and acceptance of boy rape 4) Formation of colluding networks to infiltrate and control institutions with access to boys 1/?https://twitter.com/zackmdavis/status/1216973242381950977 …
-
Show this thread
-
5) Chesterton's fence (possibly redundant) *all* surviving functional societies have a strong taboo against acceptance - immensely unlikely to occur without there being a selective filter 6) Suppression and thought control 2/?
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
6 (cont'd) - people are naturally repulsed by homosexuality but this leads to conflict if its officially tolerated so *someone* has to have his freedom to speak curtailed - "bake the cake, bigot" 3/?
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
7) The "tolerance" needed for (6) leads to harmfully obfuscating gender neutral language when discussing mating. People get bad information that causes bad decisions in vitally important matters because clear language is seen as offensive 4/?
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
8) Breaks a Schelling point on families and social support for them 9) They're a key
#bioleninist power group due to several of the facts above and have such a low metaphorical BATNA - a very bad overall society would be seen as an improvement as long as they're accepted 5/?1 reply 1 retweet 3 likesShow this thread
For a probably *still* incomplete list see here: http://blog.jim.com/culture/gay-needs-to-be-suppressed … 6/6
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.