In evolutionary terms women who didn't immediately fall in love with conquerors and gladly have their children were dead ends. Women who did, weren't. Place your bets on the behavior of women descended from that selective filter.
There's no pool of women who go unmarried so there's no selection against taste in men that cause spinsterhood. No society until the modern world was stupid enough to allow women to freely choose mates. Without women dying without issue, you don't get selection.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Only if her attraction matters for her mate choice which historically it didn't. Her husband was chosen by her father. Repeating: no (surviving) human society was stupid enough to allow free female mate choice.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.