From a Pascal's Wager type perspective, I see rational value in religion. But personally, I have a hard time reconciling a God great enough to create the universe with one petty enough to demand to be worshipped or who cares about anyone's sex life.
-
-
Which fits with the Pascal's Wager style perspective that I started with: I don't argue against a general effectiveness of religious traditions which are often casually dismissed. But I find your argument they're innate consequences of the universe unpersuasive.
-
How can they be understood as anything other than consequences of the nature of the universe? Game theory is timeless and exists for all possible beings Sexually spread infections are a consequence of the nature of life
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.