"His research conclusions have been reliably consistent with his politics"
@charlesmurray please make your politics inconsistent with your research conclusions. Either fake your research, or espouse politics that you believe is based on falsehoods, we don't mind which. Thanks!https://twitter.com/ikepoker/status/1201702726050074625 …
-
-
The conflicts then become "which sources are considered reliable?" and "how can I get a certified source to say something?" Strange implicit epistemology, no? The twitter feed of NYT reporter is "original research" but the same author writing in NYT is writing ex cathedra 3/
-
The first hurdle excludes any source that might say something that the leftist egregore finds objectionable. The second allows it to make pronouncements that are then taken as true by mirrored rules in other institutions ("we follow industry standards") 4/
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.