"His research conclusions have been reliably consistent with his politics"
@charlesmurray please make your politics inconsistent with your research conclusions. Either fake your research, or espouse politics that you believe is based on falsehoods, we don't mind which. Thanks!https://twitter.com/ikepoker/status/1201702726050074625 …
-
-
You can see a middle brow example of this in wikipedia. Wikipedia is implicitly in the business of accurately describing the world yet their standards for inclusion in an article aren't "is this proveably true?" it's "has a 'reliable source' reported it". 2/
-
The conflicts then become "which sources are considered reliable?" and "how can I get a certified source to say something?" Strange implicit epistemology, no? The twitter feed of NYT reporter is "original research" but the same author writing in NYT is writing ex cathedra 3/
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.