There is a huge difference between anecdotal and researched. It may seem 'obvious' or 'common sense' to many, but having it backed up by data is the difference between 'bad air' and 'viruses and bacteria'.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @RealDentedTony @ImHardcory
Not in this case, because this study is just validating common sense, not uncovering a hidden cause as in your analogy.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @dpinsen @ImHardcory
In those days it was 'obvious and common sense' that 'bad air' was the cause of illness and only after 'methodical scientific research' were 'viruses and bacteria' blamed.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RealDentedTony @ImHardcory
But this case, the study is just confirming bad air is the cause. Social science is never as revelatory as hard science.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes
Anecdote and common sense are better forms of evidence in social sciences than studies. If your study contradicts everyday experience, it's not going to replicate - stereotypes / common sense do replicate.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.