You missed the point entirely. Walsh is saying that Vox liking the feud between TPUSA/groypers proves that groypers are doing something liberals *like* (not dislike). Namely, causing dissension in conservative ranks, embarrassing Trump Jr., making cons look bad etc.
-
-
I’m sure Vox loves groypers in the sense that they are the the straw man version of “Conservativism” the left wants to attack. They are the bigots the left says all conservatives are. I’m not a fan of TPUSA either btw. I’m just trying to understand how you can defend AF.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
What's to defend? How could one defend NOT demanding America's government prioritize the well-being and interests of its own citizens over illegal immigrants, foreign nations, international corporations etc.? To fail to be America First would be immoral.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I now question whether we are really having an honest conversation here. You ignored my reference of
@NickJFuentes racist statements, and you haven’t responded to my concern that advocating for “white interests” is working from the same principles Douglas used to defend slavery.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
When the topics brought up by AF/groyper types (or me) have literally nothing to do with blacks, slavery etc. why are you even mentioning it? And yes, you can defend white interests while also being anti-black (Douglas). Alternatively you can just defend white interests.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
What is a “white interest”, as opposed to a “human interest”? I don’t even know what that means. It’s like advocating for “hazel-eyed” interests. Are you concerned about getting sunscreen with a high enough SPF count? It’s also weird that you still haven’t condemned slavery.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It's much weirder you randomly asked someone to condemn it. Do you condemn the sacking of Constantinople? Whites are a classification of human whose interests often clash with other humans. Do you oppose Jews lobbying on behalf of Jewish interests?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
A country has a right to look after its own interests. That interest shouldn’t be delineated by race. Eg. America ≠ White America. Do you affirm the Declaration? Do you agree with Lincoln that it applies to all men? Or do you agree with Douglas that it applies to only white men?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I don't affirm the Declaration, but not for racial reasons. And countries defending their interests is fine, but so are smaller sub-groups within countries defending their interests. Not mutually exclusive.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I wasn’t expecting a denouncement of the Declaration, but ok.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Rebellion against the lawful sovereign for trivial reasons is a massive crime and the American Revolution could easily have turned into the French Revolution. Instead it took about 80 years to erupt in a massive bloodbath - much better.
-
-
“Trivial”. Ok. Do you agree that human beings have inalienable rights or don’t you?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.