You missed the point entirely. Walsh is saying that Vox liking the feud between TPUSA/groypers proves that groypers are doing something liberals *like* (not dislike). Namely, causing dissension in conservative ranks, embarrassing Trump Jr., making cons look bad etc.
-
-
I’m sure Vox loves groypers in the sense that they are the the straw man version of “Conservativism” the left wants to attack. They are the bigots the left says all conservatives are. I’m not a fan of TPUSA either btw. I’m just trying to understand how you can defend AF.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
What's to defend? How could one defend NOT demanding America's government prioritize the well-being and interests of its own citizens over illegal immigrants, foreign nations, international corporations etc.? To fail to be America First would be immoral.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I now question whether we are really having an honest conversation here. You ignored my reference of
@NickJFuentes racist statements, and you haven’t responded to my concern that advocating for “white interests” is working from the same principles Douglas used to defend slavery.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
When the topics brought up by AF/groyper types (or me) have literally nothing to do with blacks, slavery etc. why are you even mentioning it? And yes, you can defend white interests while also being anti-black (Douglas). Alternatively you can just defend white interests.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
What is a “white interest”, as opposed to a “human interest”? I don’t even know what that means. It’s like advocating for “hazel-eyed” interests. Are you concerned about getting sunscreen with a high enough SPF count? It’s also weird that you still haven’t condemned slavery.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It's much weirder you randomly asked someone to condemn it. Do you condemn the sacking of Constantinople? Whites are a classification of human whose interests often clash with other humans. Do you oppose Jews lobbying on behalf of Jewish interests?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
A country has a right to look after its own interests. That interest shouldn’t be delineated by race. Eg. America ≠ White America. Do you affirm the Declaration? Do you agree with Lincoln that it applies to all men? Or do you agree with Douglas that it applies to only white men?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
The Declaration included in the offenses worth of rebellion that King George was his deafness to the bonds of consanguinity. Do you denounce the Declaration? The constitution states that the purpose of the USG is to benefit the posterity of founders - do you denounce it?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
“Government, in my humble opinion, should be formed to secure and to enlarge the exercise of the natural rights of its members; and every government, which has not this in view, as its principal object, is not a government of the legitimate kind." ~ James Wilson - Founder
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Right, *of its members* They were quite clear who its members were - themselves and their posterity. Do you denounce the Constitution? Do you denounce the Declaration?
-
-
No. Weird flexes. These principles were the foundation for opposing things such as slavery. Your flex is to reject the principle reason to oppose things such as slavery? Well done
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.