I agree with a small piece of it but also think this thread fails to acknowledge a major elephant in the room: the second amendment and precedent recognizing the individual right is already there; therefore the debate is not whether it is but whether to remove it. 1/2https://twitter.com/willwilkinson/status/1174360008080941056 …
They're useful if they're credible. Unfortunately the volume of threats often has an inverse correlation with their seriousness. The upside is that a culture of unserious boasting provides camouflage for the few men who *are* serious and those are might be enough to keep a truce
-
-
Neither type is useful. The Civil War demonstrated that there is no longer a right for states to secede and the consequences of mistaking that. By extension, there is no right for citizens to dissolve their state government & so forth. This rhetoric is an invitation to suicide.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.