The idea that "miners don't rule BTC" is embedding a libertarian assumption that (can) fail in the real world. Let's examine the idea and why it usually holds but can fail under attack.https://twitter.com/sthenc/status/1172039663327952896 …
-
-
States exist specifically to solve problems like this Here's the thing though - the Chinese government doesn't want to do this because they'd kill the value of BTC.
Show this thread -
"How is that different from any government ignoring property rights?" IT'S NOT! Any government can seize property in its domain and the only practical restraint them is that they kill the value of their property - a gvt that maximizes the PV of their property doesn't do that
Show this thread -
Western governments have been acting against their own interests for a very long time because no one owns them and they're controlled by constantly shifting hidden internal coalitions so no one cares about maximizing the PV of the enterprise
Show this thread -
China seems to not act this way and actually respects property rights more strongly than the US Stark example in a photograph - in the US there's the Kelo decision in China this guy didn't want to sell his house when they wanted to build a highwaypic.twitter.com/7naZNFEOca
Show this thread -
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.