The antinatalist claim as I understand it is that if you kill yourself, you will inflict avoidable suffering on all the people who care about your continued existence, and this is scarcely better than having a child. The only thing to do is to go on nobly spreading antinatalism
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Suppose there were groups of humans who are 99.9% guaranteed to defect from any kind of antinatalist equilibrium, would that change your moral calculus? Or do your morals dictate that if everyone won't cooperate, you must concede your principles to defectors who don't share them?
0 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
trying to help you think up a few examples
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
You are so close to an epiphany here
1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes
Let's imagine for a moment that we live in an alternate universe where genes can affect behavior and this world does what he wants
I wonder what would happen to the first man to have a mutation that causes him to ignore womens' choices to get educated and not have children 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.