Probably, white people will become more Republican, making them competitive. 40-45% of whites vote Democrat, will decrease over time. GOP will shift more populist on economics and become the white people party with Dems being the PoC party. https://t.co/f2eeFymMIu
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
As whites become a minority, they will start to act like a minority and vote along ethnic lines. Ideology will take a backseat to race. The GOP will become a big tent white party, so will become less ideological and more populist on economics. If they don't, GOP will be replaced
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @FreeNortherner
The problem with that strategy is it's an asymmetric weapon - the Dem coalition can live off taxes siphoned from whites and this is at least plausibly an improvement for them but whites can't do the reverse
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon
It's not a strategy per se, it's how things will have to work. Populist doesn't necessarily mean "free health care for all"; it means economics preferred by lower-to-middle (white) classes (which will shift over time) rather than ideological adherence to free markets.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FreeNortherner
Divergence from free markets boils down to "siphon funds from someone to pay someone else" but that only works when you have someone to siphon funds from - whites don't Make work affirmative action jobs for whites aren't a net benefit to whites b/c other whites are paying for it
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon
"From someone to pay for someone else" has a very wide latitude within it. Siphoning from ultra-rich whites and Jews to poor-to-middle class whites will become (perhaps is) exceedingly popular if phrased and enacted correctly.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FreeNortherner
Of course it would be popular but it simply doesn't work - you've recreated communism 1.0 which failed for very good reason. Turns out that the rich don't have to work as hard as they do and turns out that the rich's labor and investment are necessary
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
This means you move down the chain and have to move more and more away from lower and lower to get enough to pay off your constituents with *something* but they tend to notice that your pay offs are worth less than their output in a functional economy
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.