There was no incorrect info. The Holt piece showed zero inaccuracies; did you even read it? The only substantive claim was that the source data of the study was confidential. Which nobody has ever given a shit about for studies published in the press.https://twitter.com/drmistercody/status/1139034251884503040 …
Snopes is a collection of this stuff. The page about the Detroit / Hiroshima meme is a particularly good example (they rated it "false")