This is how alt-righters who learn history from Kevin MacDonald get a distorted worldview. Sounds like Ehrlich was up to the usual Jewish tricks. But his famous opponent was another Jew—Julian Simon—who argued for more pop growth and opposed birth control. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon%E2%80%93Ehrlich_wager …https://twitter.com/TOOEdit/status/1133045613283512321 …
-
-
Replying to @nathancofnas
Just because Simon opposed Ehrlich that doesnt mean Ehrlich wasnt acting on his Jewishness.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @KiichiFujimoto
That is a logical possibility. But if Jews are almost always leading advocates of opposing views the more parsimonious explanation is that Jews are simply overrepresented in intellectual activities.
6 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @whichwaythen
Indeed, non-parsimonious theories can be correct. But if you want to defend a less parsimonious theory you need some justification for postulating extra entities/forces. "Ehrlich but not Simon was motivated by Jewishness although there is no evidence for this" is a bad theory.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
Members of group A hire and promote without regards to ethnicity, members of group B are only really comfortable around other Bs. B has a higher average IQ but is much smaller in number so that a beachhead of Bs gets established in intellectual realms. Over time Bs predominate.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.