It's part of her willing blindness - she *has* to make a "both sides have flaws" appeal because it's the only way to dismiss evidence that journalists are lying ideologues It's important to her position that she gets to dismiss those claims
Why is it important that she *dismiss* the claims rather than examining the evidence?
-
-
Because she's a propagandist of the "everything is fine" school and knows that a dispassionate presentation of the evidence about journalists would be devastating to their public perception among people who don't pay close attention
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.