Miiiiight want to do a little research on that one chief. What I said was factually correct and is used as an argument by everyone from geneticists to anthropologists. And by “my side” ... are you saying you disagree with the scientists on this one?
-
-
Replying to @ILoveUTigerLily @aterfoddbitch
Absolutely, totally wrong The smarter people on your side only argue that "there's no bright line" -> "any line is arbitrary" -> "arbitrary line is socially constructed" -> "socially constructed" = meaningless (last step implied)pic.twitter.com/MUjzpxKL4V
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @aterfoddbitch
You’re way out of your league on this one. You appear to be confusing subspecies taxonomy (of which there is extreme taxonomic clarity that there are no human subspecies) with race. The entire scientific community agrees with me on this one.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ILoveUTigerLily @aterfoddbitch

The simple fact is that human races are as genetically different as whole separate species - which is why no one serious makes the argument you're making
Instead they make a different argument and you don't understand why because you don't even know the basic facts2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @aterfoddbitch
I would recommend enrolling at a local community college for a semester or two to start learning the basics of science. There are species that vary orders of magnitude more than humans that don’t have subspecies classifications.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ILoveUTigerLily @aterfoddbitch
Ok name one species that has at least two isolated breeding populations that differ by as much as 0.153 F(st) that aren't classified as at least two species
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @aterfoddbitch
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0f8e/20aff6e5b93904ea2223603675af284640c0.pdf … Goes as high as .46 (well over double the largest human distance) in a species that doesn’t even have any recognized taxonomic subspecies!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ILoveUTigerLily @aterfoddbitch
So human races are about as different as many dog breeds bred intentionally to have different abilities, interests and temperaments and less different than the extreme differences in dog breeds You think this helps your argument?

1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CovfefeAnon @aterfoddbitch
4 Lv. 11 Geodudes Retweeted Covfefe Anon
Where’d those goalposts go? They were right here a second ago but now I can’t find them anywhere? Did somebody MOVE them?https://twitter.com/covfefeanon/status/1076604079311343618?s=21 …
4 Lv. 11 Geodudes added,
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
And yeah, the most extremely different human populations you can get are about as far apart from each other as *checks notes* the two most similar dog breeds in the study.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes

Go say that to your leftist friends and see what happens
"Human races are as real and significant as the difference between chow chows and border collies"


Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.