The same argument that they're making applied to "childhood" applies to race - it's technically true and empty of content in both cases You're capable of understanding this in one context but not another
Absolutely, totally wrong The smarter people on your side only argue that "there's no bright line" -> "any line is arbitrary" -> "arbitrary line is socially constructed" -> "socially constructed" = meaningless (last step implied)pic.twitter.com/MUjzpxKL4V
-
-
You’re way out of your league on this one. You appear to be confusing subspecies taxonomy (of which there is extreme taxonomic clarity that there are no human subspecies) with race. The entire scientific community agrees with me on this one.
-
Clinal variation is one part of the arguments used in debates with uneducated “race realists” but it’s not the reason that no working geneticist will agree with you.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.