The same argument that they're making applied to "childhood" applies to race - it's technically true and empty of content in both cases You're capable of understanding this in one context but not another
Factually incorrect and not the actual argument that gets made Find out what your own side's argument actually is
-
-
Miiiiight want to do a little research on that one chief. What I said was factually correct and is used as an argument by everyone from geneticists to anthropologists. And by “my side” ... are you saying you disagree with the scientists on this one?
-
Absolutely, totally wrong The smarter people on your side only argue that "there's no bright line" -> "any line is arbitrary" -> "arbitrary line is socially constructed" -> "socially constructed" = meaningless (last step implied)pic.twitter.com/MUjzpxKL4V
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.