Obviously you can have no free speech with 1A - that's what we have now The argument is that *free speech* has a value - not that 1A does
Why do you think they bothered to write the 1A? Either it's because they valued open debate and thought the only threat to it was government action *or* it's because they didn't care about free speech and just didn't like government action 
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.