That's an empirical assertion Do you see how you go back and forth from empirical claims to claims about "morals"?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @SirDowden
But you're not - you're switching from "unequal rules is wrong because Enlightenment" to "unequal rules don't work" Unequal rules do work I don't care about "because Enlightenment" and you can't explain why I or anyone else should
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @SirDowden
I'll put this one on you - why do you think that it's important for everyone to be subject to the same rules? It's not an empirical argument from favorable outcomes - it's something else, right? What is that other thing? Why?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @SirDowden
"Thou shalt not have a different curfew for Bangladeshi construction workers and American investment bankers" Really? That's what you got out of that?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
"Do not seek revenge or bear a grudge against anyone *among your people*, but love your neighbor as yourself. " Hmm, make sure that you have a different set of rules when dealing with your people as opposed to when dealing with outsiders... Wonder why that might be important
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.