You're factually incorrect though - the basically only contemporary state that succeeds in having low crime without being made up of purely people from genetically low-crime populations has a list of different treatments that people from different countries of origin are subject
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @SirDowden
That's an empirical assertion Do you see how you go back and forth from empirical claims to claims about "morals"?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @SirDowden
But you're not - you're switching from "unequal rules is wrong because Enlightenment" to "unequal rules don't work" Unequal rules do work I don't care about "because Enlightenment" and you can't explain why I or anyone else should
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @SirDowden
I'll put this one on you - why do you think that it's important for everyone to be subject to the same rules? It's not an empirical argument from favorable outcomes - it's something else, right? What is that other thing? Why?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
You keep doing this It's not about judgment after the fact - it's about setting up rules so that's not needed
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.