Again, you're talking about what to do about the barn door after the horse has bolted The idea is to set up rules so that *murders don't happen* Looking at the societies that succeed at this they sure as hell aren't guided by Enlightenment ideas about practical governance
That's an empirical assertion Do you see how you go back and forth from empirical claims to claims about "morals"?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
But you're not - you're switching from "unequal rules is wrong because Enlightenment" to "unequal rules don't work" Unequal rules do work I don't care about "because Enlightenment" and you can't explain why I or anyone else should
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.