If there was a hypothetical group that if they had a single drink went into a random, murderous rampage you wouldn't support rules against them being allowed to drink? Why not? Because that rule doesn't apply to everyone? Why does that matter?
Whether or not you see it - it works Setting curfews for guest workers Deportations for minor offenses because they're a sign that this particular person isn't able to handle even the limited freedom allowed None of these are "swift executions" because the murder doesn't happen
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I started with Singapore because it's a live example You want "unequal treatment" look at the segregationist South Unequal treatment of different groups prevented a *huge* number of murders by the more criminally inclined race
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.