told y'all this would be the conclusionhttps://twitter.com/mmurraypolitics/status/1007266871299715072 …
Hypothetical example - Some candidate uses their former position to commit many serious crimes Cover this up by destroying subpoenaed evidence Run for higher office There's an ongoing investigation into the crimes Was it the investigation that negatively impacted the candidacy?
-
-
Yes from DOJ POV, because they see their mandate as being to help prevent ‘embarrassment’ of certain anointed higher-ups, who in this case was Hillary Clinton Their fault was in not whitewashing her crime sufficiently smoothly, and fumbling the related PR & leak-campaign efforts
-
Oh! I get it - the DOJ is run on the spoils system where the appointees are meant to be loyal to their patron I assume when the other guy won he just fired everyone and replaced them with his own loyalists, right?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.