Ah, so that's what an essay written by a low g / medium verbal IQ looks like Pieces like that one in the tablet are what got me to take argument's like Joyce's and Unz's seriously in the first place - there's not an argument to be found just paragraph after paragraph of sneers
The author increased the chances that the reader won't *consider* the opposing argument at the expense of making the reader more likely to be persuaded of the argument if he *does* consider it Does that strike anyone as a good long-term strategy?