Context?
The fact that WSJ are pressuring charities to refund money due to politics is disgusting. The money was to go towards sick kids with cancer, but WSJ are trying to take it away, just so they can get a win. There is a silver lining, there is no way WSJ can recover from this.
-
-
-
The WSJ targeted a popular YouTube channel that had done a charity stream for St. Jude. As a result, YouTube canceled all donations from the charity stream ($27K worth), taking the money away from St. Jude over WSJ's attack on the channel.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Lol what makes you say that. Name me one large publication that ran this story.
-
Remember of the bomb threat at Mythcon? Pretty sure it took at least a day for anyone notable to publish a story about it. Maybe even two.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
.....what? Letting them know about the Killstream? This is a public service
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Has anyone let
@pewdiepie know?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Do you have proof? Pls link details so we can help
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@WSJ how about this ????Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.