-
-
Why mitigate for 1.5°C & adapt for 4°C? There’s deep uncertainty about: what emissions trajectory we’ll be on, climate sensitivity, & timing/magnitude of impacts. Plus because of the planning fallacy, we need an equitable contingency for this megaproject. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planning_fallacy …
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Adapt for 4°C is basically a massive global refugee resettlement program for over 2 billion people.
-
Don’t need to do it all at once. But also can’t do it all at once if ends up needed. Make equitable investments adaptively, preserve options, minimize regret, center marginalized communities, look for mitigation-adaptation synergies.
- Još 5 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I doubt there's adaptability to 4°C.
-
Not for Australia, judging by the way things are going now.https://twitter.com/RARohde/status/1199612662449094657 …
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
'We need enough mitigation to avoid the unmanageable, enough adaptation to manage the unavoidable" - Holdrenhttps://twitter.com/70sBachchan/status/1195032947486687232 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
It is a time of ending.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.