Du kannst deine Tweets vom Web aus und über Drittapplikationen mit einem Standort versehen, wie z.B. deiner Stadt oder deinem genauen Standort. Du hast jederzeit die Möglichkeit, Standortangaben nachträglich zu löschen. Mehr erfahren
The thing is while the structures of Starship/SH is more shipyard building like than any other rocket out there, it uses some of the most state-of-the-art engines ever. Not every main space power out there has the ability to develop their Raptors after all (e.g. the Chinese).
But then, not everyone needs such a big vehicle like Starship right now. Replicating current rockets' capabilities w/ something like a "mini-Starship" & built in shipyards like factories might be enough to keep the balls running.
So for example, let's say I'm a Russian & wants to replace the Soyuz w/ a one-on-one replacement. Can we just take the 50+ years old Soyuz engines design (kerosene, fixed nozzles w/ verniers, started by burning wooden sticks, extremely flight proven) & slap them onto the booster?
There can be additional engines installed specifically used for landing for example. The orbital stage part can also use off-the-shelf engines (RD-0124 comes to mind). Given the Russians still have good leads in metallurgy/re-entry control, is this "Starship Soyuz" even possible?
Or take the Europeans & Japanese for example, which relied on LH2 & solids for decades. Can a "mini-SRB-SH" stage using SRB motors wrapped by recovery system powered by LH2 engines, + LH2 powered "mini-Starship" even feasible considering troubles w/ DC-X 20 years ago?
Submit your own "Starship wannabe" designs using as much current OTS components of your own region here for discussion! 
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.
