Not sure. Wasn't Ariane 1 first stage heavier?
-
-
-
This was also made of steel and not aluminium. Unlike the lighter Ariane 1 second stage or Falcon 9, which both use aluminium.
Ende der Unterhaltung
Neue Unterhaltung -
-
-
very hard to achieve a non-destructive parachute landing with a 10-stories high / 26 tons booster.
-
Not just that. Note they also attempted parachute recovery of Falcon 1. Part of it is that I believe they're also using like a ballute or something and added a bunch of TPS to Electron (and RCS for stage orientation, which Falcon 1 didn't have).
Ende der Unterhaltung
Neue Unterhaltung -
-
-
Falcon9 & electron. Is there a Big difference in first stage velocity? Or similar staging?
Danke! Twitter wird dies nutzen, um deine Timeline zu verbessern. Rückgängig machenRückgängig machen
-
-
-
Electron has more surface area compared to its mass. So the re-entry heat is distributed over a larger area. It is also a bit slower I think, but I'm not sure.
-
It is also shorter, which decreases the bending loads that the tanks walls have to sustain during re-entry.
- Antworten anzeigen
Neue Unterhaltung -
-
-
Falcon 9 first stage ~30 tons and nearly 50m tall.
-
Not just that. Note they also attempted parachute recovery of Falcon 1. Part of it is that I believe they're also using like a ballute or something and added a bunch of TPS to Electron (and RCS for stage orientation, which Falcon 1 didn't have).
Ende der Unterhaltung
Neue Unterhaltung -
-
-
Not just that. Note they also attempted parachute recovery of Falcon 1. Part of it is that I believe they're also using like a ballute or something and added a bunch of TPS to Electron (and RCS for stage orientation, which Falcon 1 didn't have).
-
But they couldn't right since it would add more weight..have a kind of catch-22
- Antworten anzeigen
Neue Unterhaltung -
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.
