In light of this explosion:
https://twitter.com/NASASpaceflight/status/1197265917589303296 …
and this one from 2016:
https://www.theverge.com/2016/9/23/13031308/spacex-falcon-9-rocket-explosion-cause-cryogenic-helium-system …
I'll just bring up the fact that the safety gurus at @nasa approved this:
https://spacenews.com/nasa-approves-load-and-go-fueling-for-spacex-commercial-crew-launches/ …
-
0:18 -
Although you do realize it would be nonsensical to compare the AMOS-6 Static Fire issue caused by a COPV fault on a flight Falcon 9 booster with a cryoproofing test that was designed to push the limits and gain data on a non-flight Starship prototype filled with LN2?
6 Antworten 0 Retweets 72 Gefällt mir
A better comparison would be rupturing of a new airplane model's Static Test Airframe during cabin pressurization tests at a lower test load/pressure than planned.
05:08 - 22. Nov. 2019
0 Antworten
0 Retweets
3 Gefällt mir
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.